Richard Lincoln v. Daniel Bailey, No. 09-6602 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6602 RICHARD POWERS LINCOLN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL E. BAILEY, Sheriff; ARAMARK CORPORATION; B. SMITH SCOTT; L. PAGEN, Major; M. SMITH, Captain; J. PLOGER, Captain; J. MANESS, Sergeant; D. TRUESDALE, Sergeant; G. ROGERS, Sergeant; P. IGWESI, Detention Officer; J. SAGE, Detention Officer; K. JOHNSON, Detention Officer; C. SMITH, Detention Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00058-GCM) Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Powers Lincoln, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Richard Powers Lincoln appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Lincoln v. Bailey, No. 3:09-cv-00058-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. court. 3, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.