US v. Anthony Haynesworth, No. 09-6034 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6034 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY HAYNESWORTH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00286-CMC-1) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Haynesworth appeals the district court s order denying his motion for U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Haynesworth, No. 3:99-cr-00268-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 22, 2008), and the reasons expressed in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir. 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.