William Morris, No. 09-2302 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2302 In Re: WILLIAM D. MORRIS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: March 29, 2010 (0:05-cr-00056-MBS-1) Decided: April 15, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William D. Morris, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William D. Morris, convicted and sentenced to eightyfour months in prison in the District Court for the Southern District of Georgia after pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count each of wire, mail and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 1341, 1343-44 (2000), has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Morris asks, among other things, that this court direct the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion for sentence reduction on his behalf. To obtain mandamus relief, a petitioner must show that: (1) he has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought; (2) the responding party has a clear duty to do the specific act requested; (3) the act requested is an official act or duty; (4) there are no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires; and (5) the issuance of the writ will effect right and justice in the circumstances. In re Braxton, quotation marks 258 F.3d and 250, citation 261 (4th Cir. omitted). 2001) We have (internal considered Morris s petition and find that he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral contentions argument because the facts 2 and legal are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.