Rosa Pringle v. Daniel Martin, Jr., No. 09-2156 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2156 ROSA LEE PRINGLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL H. MARTIN, JR., a/k/a Daniel E. Martin, Sr., a/k/a Former Judge Daniel E. Martin, Sr., Former Atty Daniel E. Martin, Sr., Nickname Atty Danny Jr, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:08-cv-02799-PMD) Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosa Lee Pringle, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM Rosa Lee Pringle seeks to appeal the district court s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). [T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement. Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Pringle filed her notice of appeal more than thirty days after the entry of both reconsideration. extension of the original judgment and the denial of Further, she failed to properly move for an time or for reopening of the appeal period. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal of these orders as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.