Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County, No. 09-2138 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2138 HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.; CHANTE N. HODGE, Mrs., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. CALVERT COUNTY, (local government); STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND STATE TREASURER; ST. MARY'S COUNTY, (local government); TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, Head Sheriff in his individual and public official capacity; THOMAS HEDDERICH, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; WILLIAM RAY, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; UNKNOWN SWAT TEAM AND POLICE MEMBERS, John Does in their individual and public official capacities; MIKE EVANS, Head Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; RICKEY COX, Deputy, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; RICKY THOMAS, Lieutenant, in his individual and public official capacity; SUTTON, Deputy or Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; CANNING, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; FENTON, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; UNKNOWN (SOT), SWAT TEAM MEMBER OF THE CLAVERT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, John Does in their individual and public official capacities; ROBERT B. RIDDLE, Judge, in his individual capacity and public official capacity; CALVERT DETENTION CENTER; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, last name to be Fenton in his individual and public official capacity; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY SUTTON, in his individual and public official capacity, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-02252-PJM) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Chante N. Hodge, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Harold H. Hodge, Jr., and Chante N. Hodge appeal the district court s order dismissing their civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Hodge v. Calvert County, No. 8:09-cv-02252-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
