Yanne Venieris v. Family Living Institute, No. 09-1955 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1955 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FAMILY LIVING INSTITUTE, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1963 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT WITTMAN, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1964 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1965 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RIVERSIDE BEHAVIORAL, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1967 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1979 YANNE VENIERIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARACK OBAMA, President, Defendant - Appellee. 2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00103-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00101-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00095-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00102-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00100-RBSTEM; 4:09-cv-00098-RBS-TEM) Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yanne Venieris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 3 PER CURIAM: Yanne dismissing his Venieris six civil appeals suits U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). the as district frivolous court's pursuant orders to 28 We have reviewed the records in these cases and find that Venieris appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Venieris v. Family Living Inst., No. 4:09cv-00103-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2009); Venieris v. Wittman, No. 4:09-cv-00101-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2009); Venieris v. Drug Enforcement Agency, No. 4:09-cv-00095-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2009); Venieris v. Riverside Behavioral, No. 4:09-cv00102-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 14, 2009 & entered Aug. 17, 2009); Venieris v. Obama, No. 4:09-cv-00100-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. August 17, 2009); Venieris v. Obama, No. 4:09-cv-00098-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. August 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.