Matthew Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, In, No. 09-1852 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1852 MATTHEW ENDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RYDER INTEGRATED GROUP, LOGISTICS, INCORPORATED; THE PARKSITE Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM) Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., McLean, Virginia; James R. Pranger, NEAL, GERBER AND EISENBERG, LLC, Chicago, Illinois; Steven D. Silverman, Andrew Clayton White, SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew Enders appeals the district granting summary judgment for Appellees. court s order We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the court. reasons Integrated stated the district Logistics, 1:08-cv-03042-JFM Enders by motion (D. to Md. Inc., July expedite and Nos. 16, 2009). dispense Enders v. Ryder 1:08-cv-03211-JFM; We with deny as moot oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.