Stephen Stone v. Seneca South Carolina, City of, No. 09-1693 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1693 STEPHEN W. STONE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03401-HFF) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all of Stone s claims. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal before contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.