Kofi Amakona v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 09-1494 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1494 KOFI AMAKONA, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 18, 2010 Decided: May 17, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kofi Amakona, Petitioner Litigation Counsel, Theo Litigation, UNITED STATES D.C., for Respondent. Pro Se. Carol Federighi, Senior Nickerson, Office of Immigration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kofi Amakona, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge s denial of his applications for relief from removal. Amakona challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility determination denying for asylum. eligibility To for obtain relief, reversal an of alien a must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution. (1992). INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Amakona fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Amakona cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). 1999); INS v. Finally, we uphold the finding below that Amakona did not demonstrate eligibility for protection under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 1208.16(c)(2), (3) (2009). Accordingly, dispense with oral we deny argument the petition because 2 the for facts review. and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.