Christina Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, No. 09-1289 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1289 CHRISTINA D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00100-MSD-JEB) Submitted: September 17, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christina D. Perry-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Wilbur Jacobs, II, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christina D. Perry-Bey seeks to appeal the district court s order dismissing her complaint without prejudice. court may exercise jurisdiction only over final This orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Perry-Bey seeks to appeal is neither a final appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The order order nor an See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.