Alexander Development Corporat v. Raheem Muhammad, No. 09-1267 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1267 ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED, CORPORATION; MCSHEA MANAGEMENT Plaintiffs Appellees, v. RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:09-cv-00132-DKC) Submitted: November 5, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raheem Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bernard McParland, BREGMAN BERBERT SCHWARTZ AND GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court s order remanding this case back to state court. Because the remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28 (1995); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir. 2008); Borneman v. United States, 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.