Fred Tisdell v. Terry Bullock, No. 08-8433 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8433 FRED MELVIN TISDELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY BULLOCK, Superintendent Hoke Correctional Institution; CATHY WEBB, Unit Manager, Hoke C.I.; T. E. CRAIG, Correctional Officer, Hoke C.I.; AMY S. MACKEY, Physician's Assistant, Hoke C.I.; ANDREW BUSH, M.D., Physician, Duke Regional Hosp.; PHILLIP STOVER, M.D., Physician, N.C. Department of Corrections; KAY LOCKLEAR, R.N., Supervising Nurse, Lumberton Correctional Inst.; DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL; THEODIS BECK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00603-NCT-RAE) Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 24, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Melvin Tisdell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fred Melvin Tisdell appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 00603-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. motions appointment for Oct. of Tisdell v. Bullock, No. 1:08-cv23, 2008). counsel, We for a deny Tisdell s transcript at government expense, for production of documents, to amend or correct the caption, and for acknowledgement defendants on all forthcoming documents. of the main We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.