Harvey Short v. Prime Care Medical, No. 08-8317 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8317 HARVEY P. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRED; DR CORDER, Psychiatrist; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUSH; NURSE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRY; LIEUTENANT ROGERS; JOHN MCKAY, Jail Administrator; DAVID FARMER, Counselor Supervisor; LAVANA DAVIS-HARVEY, Counselor; SERGEANT THOMPSON; SERGEANT BINOIN; SERGEANT ATKINS; MARK BECK, Physician Assistant; SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00933) Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harvey P. Short appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Short s motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. and find no reversible error. reasons stated Medical, No. dispense with by the oral Accordingly, we affirm for the district 2:06-cv-00933 court. (S.D.W. argument We have reviewed the record Va. because Short Oct. the v. Prime Care 17, 2008). We facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.