US v. Anthony Olvis, No. 08-7160 (4th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7160 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. order. § 3582(c)(2) We error. have (2006), reviewed the and record reconsideration and find no of that reversible Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse See United States v. its discretion in denying the motion. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) is subject to the discretion of the district court ); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm stated therein. the district court s orders for the reasons See United States v. Olvis, No. 4:95-cr-00038- RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2008; filed Apr. 29, 2008 & entered May 2, 2008). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
