Edson Furtado v. Cornelius Vaugheys, No. 08-6266 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6266 EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORNELIUS J. VAUGHEYS, Judge; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03251-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny Furtado s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Vaugheys, No. 8:07-cv-03251-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.