Sherrod Bright v. US Department of Justice Drug, No. 08-2146 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2146 SHERROD V. BRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; FLORENCE COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-03002-TLW) Submitted: March 12, 2009 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. SHEDD, Decided: Circuit Judges, and March 16, 2009 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherrod V. Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; James C. Rushton, III, HYMAN LAW FIRM, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sherrod V. Bright appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bright's motion to consolidate and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bright v. U.S. Dep't of Justice Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 4:07-cv-03002-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.