Charles Penland, Sr. v. County of Spartanburg, No. 08-1925 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1925 CHARLES W. PENLAND, Sr.; MARY PENLAND, Wife, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver; RMC OFFICE OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:07-cv-03288-HMH) Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland appeal the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. cv-03288-HMH See Penland v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:07- (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.