Sydney Sutton v. North Carolina Department of L, No. 08-1380 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1380 SYDNEY CHERYL SUTTON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cv-00308-FL) Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 4, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, MONTEITH & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sydney order granting Cheryl Defendant Sutton appeals summary the judgment district on her court s retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the North Carolina (2005). error. Whistleblower Gen. Stat. § 126-85 Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep t of Labor, 5:06-cv-00308-FL March 3, 2008). facts N.C. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible district court. No. Act, and materials legal before (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.