William Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 08-1320 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1320 WILLIAM C. BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District of Maryland, Northern Division; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the District of Maryland, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01188-WDQ) Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William C. Bond appeals from the district court s orders dismissing Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2008). We have his reviewed action the seeking record relief and find under no the reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 1:07-cv-01188-WDQ (D. Md. May 17 & Nov. 20, 2007). Additionally, we deny all of Bond s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Bond also appeals from the district court s denial of his motion for reconsideration, motion to recuse, and motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Upon review of the record, we find the district court did not err in denying Bond s motions. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.