Thomas Soul v. Movado Retail Group, Incorpora, No. 08-1072 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1072 THOMAS J. E. SOUL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MOVADO RETAIL GROUP, INCORPORATED; RICK ABOUL-HOSN; MAN CHOI; VICTORIA CUMUYANI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00365-GBL-BRP) Submitted: October 23, 2008 Decided: December 4, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas J. E. Soul, Appellant Pro Se. Rafael E. Morell, Francina Segbefia, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas J. E. Soul appeals the district court s order granting Defendant s motion for employment discrimination action. find no reversible error. summary judgment on Soul s We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Soul v. Movado Retail Group, Inc., No. 1:07-cv-00365-GBL-BRP (Nov. 8, 2007). Moreover, we find the district court neither abused its discretion in ordering Soul to pay Movado s attorneys fees incurred in connection with Soul s failure to comply with discovery orders nor erred in declining to provide Soul with court-appointed counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.