James Calhoun-El v. Gary D. Maynard, et al, No. 07-7761 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7761 JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY D. MAYNARD, Acting Secretary , Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; OFFICER BROWN; OFFICER OABOEIU; OFFICER LASANE; OFFICER EBAHA; ROWLEY, Commissioner of Correction; MOTTI MULLETTA, M.D.; CRAIG HARBOUR, Regional Manager; JAMES SMITH, Warden; WHATTAKER, Chief of Security; CAPTAIN SIMPSON; CAPTAIN WASHINGTON; CAPTAIN STAFER; CAPTAIN GUY; LIEUTENANT J. WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT M. WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT WATKINS; LIEUTENANT BROWN; LIEUTENANT COLEMAN; SERGEANT MASON; SERGEANT WALKER; OFFICER COLEMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00220-RDB) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: James Calhoun-El appeals the district court s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. affirm for the reasons stated by the order We have Accordingly, we district court. See Calhoun-El v. Maynard, No. 1:07-cv-00220-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 19, 2007 & entered Nov. 20, 2007). appoint counsel. We deny Calhoun-El s motion to We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.