Meeks v. Langley, No. 07-7625 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7625 ALFONZO MEEKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES LANGLEY; ZEB T. HEATH, JR.; CARLTON B. JOYNER; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03005) Submitted: April 9, 2008 Decided: June 16, 2008 Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfonzo Meeks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alfonzo Meeks appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny Meeks motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 5:07-ct-03005 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2007). Meeks v. Langley, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.