Belk v. Dickerhoff, No. 07-7363 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7363 RONNIE M. BELK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER DICKERHOFF, Defendant - Appellee, and SUPERINTENDENT SORRELL SAUNDERS; ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT RANDY TURNER; SERGEANT MCNEIL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03071-H) Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: April 17, 2008 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie M. Belk, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronnie M. Belk appeals the district court s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. orders We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Belk v. Dickerhoff, No. 5:06-ct-03071-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2006; Aug. 14, 2007). We grant Belk s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.