Harrison v. Adams, No. 07-6497 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6497 WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex; JOSEPH BROOKS, Former Warden, Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex; JAMES CROSS, Former Acting Warden, FCC Petersburg; CORNELIA JANZEN, Legal Liaison & Administrative Remedy Coordinator, FCC Petersburg; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; HARRELL WATTS, General Counsel/Administrative Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P.; KIMBERLEY WHITE, MidAtlantic Region Admin. Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P.; DENISE M. GOTTLIEB, Mid-Atlantic Region Admin. Remedy Coordinator, B.O.P., D. PARKER, Unit Manager, FCC Petersburg Medium; MR. CRENELL, Counselor, Petersburg FCC Medium; DOCTOR LAYBOURNE, M.D., Petersburg FCC; PHYSICIAN S ASSISTANCE PANAGUITON, P.A. at Petersburg FCC; J. FAJARDO, P.A. at Petersburg FCC; P.A. NEGRON, P.A. or Former P.A. at Petersburg FCC; MR. WYRICK, Unit Manager, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; M. T. HARDING, Case Manager, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; M. C. SPEIGHTS, Counselor, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; MR. WHEELER, Counselor, Lee Hall, Petersburg FCC; JANET MORRIS, Supervisor of Education, Petersburg FCC, DAWN RANKE, Former Associate Warden for Programming, Petersburg FCC Low; LIEUTENANT DESROCHES, Petersburg FCC Low; OFFICER BLEVINS, Corrections Officer Petersburg FCC; LORRAINE HILL, Secretary, BOP; ANNETTE BAILEY, Secretary, BOP; OFFICER MILLEMAC, C.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00501-TSE) Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: December 11, 2007 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Henry Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: William Henry Harrison appeals the district court s orders: (1) dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Adams, No. 1:06-cv-00501-TSE (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2007; filed Mar. 19, 2007, entered Mar. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.