US v. Drew Elliott McGill, No. 07-4597 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-4597 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DREW ELLIOTT MCGILL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00204-WLO) Submitted: January 9, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas N. Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Drew Elliott McGill pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B), (b)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). On appeal, he challenges the district court s imposition of the statutory maximum sentence of 120 months imprisonment. We affirm. We find that the district court properly applied the Sentencing factors Guidelines before and imposing considered the the 120-month § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). relevant sentence. sentencing 18 U.S.C.A. Additionally, we find that the sentence imposed was reasonable. See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 339, 341 (4th Cir. 2006); Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-69 accorded (2007) (upholding within-guidelines presumption sentence). of reasonableness Accordingly, we affirm McGill s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.