Stephen Bruns v. John Potter, No. 07-2125 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2125 STEPHEN E. BRUNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01076-JFM) Submitted: December 16, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. MICHAEL, Decided: Circuit Judges, January 8, 2009 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas James Gagliardo, THE GAGLIARDO LAW FIRM, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stephen E. Bruns appeals the district court s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Bruns claim of retaliation, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court s order. See Bruns v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01076-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.