Boyer v. Finley, No. 07-1882 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1882 JESSE E. BOYER, SR.; MARILYN L. BOYER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ANNIE LEE FINLEY; ROY FINLEY, Jr.; MICHAEL TAYLOR, Jr.; MICHAEL J. BLITCH; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ROBERT W. POLK, Attorney; ASHLEY SURVEY COMPANY; PATRICK R. WATTS, Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:07-cv-01868-DCN) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse E. Boyer, Sr., Marilyn L. Boyer, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jesse E. Boyer, Sr., and Marilyn L. Boyer appeal the district magistrate prejudice. court s judge order and accepting dismissing the their recommendation civil action of the without We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyer v. Finley, No. 2:07-cv-01868-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.