King v. Marriott Intl, No. 07-1880 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1880 TERRY S. KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:05-cv-01774-PMD) Submitted: February 11, 2008 Decided: February 29, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry S. King, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Montgomery Shetterly, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry King appeals the district court s orders adopting the magistrate judge s recommendation to grant summary judgment to Marriott International, Inc. on King s claim of retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. ยงยง 621634 (2000), and on King s state law contract claims. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Marriott Int l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, June 19, and Aug. 7, 2007). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.