Simpkins v. Gleams HRC, No. 07-1780 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1780 OSCAR LEVONIA SIMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GLEAMS HUMAN RESOURCE COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee, and JOSEPH PATTON; RONALD DAVIS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. William M. Catoe, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (8:06-cv-02137-WMC) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 26, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oscar Levonia Simpkins, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Oscar Levonia Simpkins appeals the magistrate judge s order* granting Defendant s motion Simpkins Title VII complaint. find no reversible error. for summary judgment on We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Simpkins v. Gleams Human Res. Comm n, No. 8:06-cv-02137-WMC (D.S.C. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.