Martin Boadu v. Michael Mukasey, No. 07-1678 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1678 MARTIN BOADU, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A94-137-636) Submitted: February 14, 2008 Decided: April 2, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jaime Winthuysen Aparisi, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lauren E. Fascett, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Martin Boadu, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Boadu s motion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2007). See Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. No. A94-137-636 (B.I.A. June 19, 2007). See In Re: Boadu, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.