Singleton v. Thrifty Car Rental, No. 07-1411 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1411 ANGONETHA SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GREGORY GREENE, CULLER; KIMBERLY OSBORNE; MARGARET Plaintiffs, versus THRIFTY CAR RENTAL, a/k/a GSP Transportation, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee. No. 07-1428 MARGARET GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GREGORY CULLER; KIMBERLY OSBORNE; ANGONETHA SINGLETON, Plaintiffs, versus THRIFTY CAR RENTAL, a/k/a GSP Transportation, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:05-cv-01758-MBS) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 26, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. No. 07-1411 affirmed; No. 07-1428 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angonetha Singleton, Margaret Greene, Appellants Pro Se. David Allen Alexander, Cecil Huron Nelson, Jr., CECIL H. NELSON, JR., L.L.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Angonetha district magistrate court s judge Singleton order and and adopting granting Margaret the summary Greene appeal recommendation judgment in the of the favor of Defendant in their 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 2000e-2000e-17 (2000) action. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). and jurisdictional. This appeal period is mandatory Browder v. Dir., Dep t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court s order was entered on the docket on March 30, 2007. 2007. Greene s notice of appeal was filed on May 14, Because Greene failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss her appeal, No. 071418. With regard to Singleton, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm in No. 07-1411 for the reasons stated by the district court. Culler v. Thrifty Car Rental, No. 3:05-cv- 01758- MBS (D.S.C. March 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument - 3 - because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. No. 07-1411 AFFIRMED No. 07-1428 DISMISSED - 4 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.