US v. Rolle, No. 06-6450 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6450 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TROY ROLLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:97-cr-00608-HMH) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 21, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Rolle, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Troy Rolle appeals the district court s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). Amendment 506 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, upon which Rolle s motion relies, has been superseded by Amendment 567 in response to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. LaBonte, 520 U.S. 751 (1997). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual App. C amends. 506, 567 (1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.