Copley v. Beck, No. 06-6206 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6206 BILLY RAY COPLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK; BOYD GEORGE KENWORTHY, BENNETT; PAULA SMITH; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-ct-00876-FL) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 31, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Ray Copley, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Billy R. Copley appeals the district court s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beck, No. 5:04-ct-00876-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). Copley v. We deny Copley s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.