Smith v. Harrison, No. 06-6040 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6040 HAROLD SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE HARRISON, Associate Warden; FRANK SPOON, Factory Manager; JERRY DEMPSEY, Foreman; MONROE, Foreman; RICKY GAULT, Foreman; ELMORE BUTCH HARRIS, Assistant Safety Manager; JOHN DOE, Property Owner; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1188-6) Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se. THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Appellees. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF Columbia, South Carolina, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Harold Smith appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Harrison, No. CA- 04-1188-6 (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 2005). Smith s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.