Kant v. Bregman, Berbert, No. 06-1017 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1017 CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus BREGMAN, BERBERT, DANIEL RIGTERINK, SCHWARTZ & GILDAY, LLC; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-3433-WMN) Submitted: May 26, 2006 Decided: June 13, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Geoffrey Townsend Hervey, BREGMAN, BERBERT, SCHWARTZ & GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Chander Kant and Ashima Kant appeal the district court s order denying relief on their civil action and denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kant v. Bregman, Berbert, Schwartz & Gilday, LLC, No. CA-04-3433-WMN (D. Md. July 5, 2005; Nov. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.