Shuck v. Bledsoe, No. 05-7150 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7150 MICHAEL R. SHUCK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN BLEDSOE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-05-214-7) Submitted: May 10, 2006 Decided: June 12, 2006 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. Shuck, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael R. Shuck, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shuck v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-214-7 (W.D. Va. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.