De Sustar-Ware v. Nordstrom, Inc, No. 05-2387 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2387 DAVID DE SUSTAR-WARE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORDSTROM, INCORPORATED; INCORPORATED, TALXUCM SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-04-1318-1) Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 14, 2006 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David de SÃ¼star-Ware, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Brown Esaw, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee Nordstrom, Inc. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: David de SÃ¼star-Ware appeals the district court s order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See de SÃ¼star-Ware v. Nordstrom, Inc., No. CA-04-1318-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.