Bryant-Bunch v. Northampton County, No. 05-2377 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2377 JUNE BRYANT-BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF WANDIE VINCENT; DETECTIVE REED; DEPUTY PARKER; DEPUTY JANE DOE; MAGISTRATE SHEARN; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; LAWRENCE SOLOMON; NEAL VAUGHAN; Lt. C. A. COLEMAN; Lt. POWELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ARCHER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PHILLIPS, all in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (CA-05-34-2) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June Bryant-Bunch, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Vaughan, Woodland, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: June Bryant-Bunch seeks to appeal the district court s denial of her motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Bryant-Bunch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. American Fed'n of Gov't Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-05 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon, 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir. 1973). appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. DISMISSED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.