Macklin v. Mirant Services, LLC, No. 05-2370 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2370 JAMES MACKLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIRANT SERVICES, L.L.C., Defendant - Appellee, and POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-555-1) Submitted: March 13, 2008 Decided: April 8, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy B. Fleming, Keir S. Bickerstaffe, WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal D. Mollen, Carson H. Sullivan, Courtney Mueller, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Macklin appeals from the district court s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mirant Services, L.L.C., on his Title discrimination and retaliation. VII complaint alleging race We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties briefs and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macklin v. Mirant Servs., L.L.C., No. CA- 05-555-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.