Pramco II, LLC v. Kissi, No. 05-1394 (4th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1394 PRAMCO II, LLC; HANNAN, LLP, EMIL HIRSCH; O CONNOR & Plaintiffs - Appellees, and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Garnishee, versus DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust, Defendant - Appellant, and EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Individually and in her capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust; AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Defendants, versus CHRISTOPHER B. MEAD; RICHARD M. KREMEN; JOSE ANDRADE, Parties in Interest. No. 05-1917 PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, and EMIL HIRSCH; O CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP, Plaintiffs, versus DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust, Defendant - Appellant, and EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Individually and in her capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust; AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST; Defendants, and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Garnishee, versus CHRISTOPHER ANDRADE, MEAD; RICHARD M. KREMEN; JOSE Parties in Interest. - 2 - No. 05-4371 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID KISSI, Defendant - Appellant, and EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Defendant, versus PRAMCO II, LLC, Party in Interest. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA03-2241-8-PJM; CR-03-473-PJM) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. - 3 - Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Emil Hirsch, James Patrick Ryan, O CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Bowmar Mead, LONDON & MEAD, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 4 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, David M. Kissi seeks to appeal from the district court s orders denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for leave to file suit against Emil Hirsch, and denying his motion to disqualify the district court judge. over final orders, This court may exercise jurisdiction only 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949); see also Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354, 358 (1957) (criminal appeal generally premature until sentence has been entered). orders nor The orders Kissi seeks to appeal are neither final appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 5 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
