Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd, No. 22-3305 (3d Cir. 2024)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 1, 2024.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 22-3305 _____________ VERTIV, INC.; VERTIV CAPITAL, INC.; and GNARITIS, INC., Appellants v. WAYNE BURT PTE, LTD., and TGS MAHESH _____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3:20-cv-00363) District Judge: Honorable Georgette Castner _____________ Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges. _______________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION It is hereby ordered that the Opinion filed on February 1, 2024, is amended as follows: On Page 22, in the last sentence (which continues onto Page 23), the words “Wayne Burt” shall be changed to “Vertiv” such that the sentence will read: “Vertiv has presented no evidence to counter the District Court’s finding about equal distribution of assets.” By the Court, s/ Arianna J. Freeman Circuit Judge Dated: February 5, 2024 Tmm/cc: Robert T. Szyba, Esq. Patrick T. Collins, Esq
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
