Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc., No. 21-2203 (3d Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 16, 2022.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 21-2203 ASHLEY POPA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant v. HARRIET CARTER GIFTS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; NAVISTONE, INC., a Delaware corporation Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 2-19-cv-00450) District Judge: Honorable William S. Stickman, IV SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING ____________________ Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, and FUENTES , Circuit Judges The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellee is granted in part. The panel has determined that the original decision should be upheld but has revised the opinion to clarify issues raised in appellee’s petition for rehearing. Accordingly, it is hereby Judge Fuentes’ vote is limited to panel rehearing only. ORDERED that the opinion filed on August 16, 2022, is hereby vacated and amended opinion shall be filed simultaneously with this order. The revised opinion does not alter the August 16, 2022, judgment. The amended opinion has been circulated to the en banc court in accordance with 3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.5.7. The majority of the judges of the circuit in regular active service having not voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied. By the Court, s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: October 18, 2022 Lmr/cc: All Counsel of Record
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
