Marcus White v., No. 20-3196 (3d Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DLD-031 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 20-3196 ___________ IN RE: MARCUS WHITE, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2:10-cr-00420-001) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. November 13, 2020 Before: JORDAN, KRAUSE and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed November 17, 2020) _________ OPINION* _________ PER CURIAM Marcus White has again filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in an attempt to challenge the jurisdictional basis of his federal convictions and sentence. For substantially the reasons we recently set forth in In re White, 823 F. App’x 121 (3d Cir. * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. 2020) (per curiam), the mandamus petition will be denied. White is warned that abuse of the writ of mandamus will result in the Court’s consideration of sanctions. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.