Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States, No. 17-1056 (3d Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 6, 2017.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT September 19, 2017 No. 17-1056 JOSHIM UDDIN, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent (Agency No. 208-059-346) Present: GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ and RENDELL, Circuit Judges 1. Motion by Respondent to Amend Opinion dated September 6, 2017. Respectfully, Clerk/tmm _________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing motion is granted. The opinion at page 20, first paragraph, last sentence which reads: “As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we review that determination for clear error.” is amended to read instead: “As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we will accept that finding if supported by substantial evidence.” An amended opinion will be issued. As this change does not alter the Court's disposition, judgment entered by the Court will not be amended. By the Court, s/MARJORIE O. RENDELL Circuit Judge Dated: September 25, 2017 tmm/cc: Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Esq. Daniel I. Smulow, Esq.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
