USA v. Karen Nicholas, No. 16-4410 (3d Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-4410 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAREN NICHOLAS, Appellant __________________________ (E.D. Pa. No. 2-15-cr-00346-004) __________________________ SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges The petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellant Karen Nicholas in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED IN PART, solely as to the evidentiary claim concerning the admissibility of the 2008 EAA Board Minutes. After consideration of Appellant’s argument, the panel has agreed to amend the opinion, which will be filed simultaneously with this order in all of the consolidated cases. Each of the judgments entered August 9, 2018, shall remain in full force and effect. BY THE COURT, s/D. Brooks Smith Chief Circuit Judge Dated: January 16, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.