Andrew Carman v. Jeremy Carroll, No. 13-2371 (3d Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 15, 2014.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 13-2371 _____________ ANDREW CARMAN and KAREN CARMAN, Appellants v. JEREMY CARROLL _____________ On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (No. 3:10-cv-01013) District Judge: Honorable James M. Munley _____________ Submitted on December 12, 2014 After Remand by the Supreme Court of the United States Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES, Circuit Judge, and SCHILLER, District Judge.1 ____________ JUDGMENT ORDER ____________ This cause came to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and upon remand from the Supreme Court of the United States 1 Honorable Berle M. Schiller, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 1 it is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court denying Appellants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the unlawful entry claim and the jury verdict regarding the Appellants' unlawful seizure claim be and hereby are AFFIRMED. By the Court, s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge ATTEST: s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Dated: December 18, 2014 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
