Dhany Rinastuti v. Attorney General United States, No. 12-1978 (3d Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 12-1978 ___________ DHANY DINAR RINASTUTI, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent ____________________________________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency No. A088-649-516) Immigration Judge: Honorable Rosalind K. Malloy ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) October 17, 2012 Before: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: October 18, 2012) _________ OPINION _________ PER CURIAM Dhany Rinastuti, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the agency s denial of relief. This is the companion case to C.A. No. 12-1977; Rinastuti is the partner of Ufuq Abror, the petitioner in that matter, and the relevant facts and issues in both matters are identical. Rinastuti fears potential persecution in Indonesia on account of a possible familial veto of her desired marriage to Abror, and also worries about societal disapproval of her children being born out of wedlock. For substantially the same reasons that we recited in 12-1977, however, Rinastuti has failed to show any basis to disturb the agency s final order of removal. We must therefore deny this petition for review.1 1 We exercise jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, as limited by 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a)(3) and 1252(d)(1). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.