In Re: Grand Jury v., No. 12-1697 (3d Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 24, 2012.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT July 12, 2012 No. 12-1697 IN RE: GRAND JURY JOHN DOE1; JOHN DOE 2; ABC CORPORATION, Appellants (E.D. Pa. No. 09-gj-00006) Present: AMBRO, HARDIMAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges 1. Motion by Appellants to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 12-2878; 2. Response by Appellee to Appellants Motion to Consolidate Appeal; 3. Amended Motion by Appellants to Consolidate C.A. Nos.:12-1697 & 12-2878; 4. Reply by Appellant In Support of Motion to Consolidate. Respectfully, Clerk/tmk _______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________ The foregoing Motion by Appellants to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 122878 is hereby granted. In doing so, we also grant Appellants Petition for Panel Rehearing in C.A. No. 12-1697. The parties are directed to file briefs addressing the issues raised in the consolidated cases including this Court s jurisdiction in No. 12-2878 according to the following schedule: Appellants brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, August 15, 2012. Appellee s brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, September 5, 2012. Appellants reply brief shall be filed by 4.P.M. Monday, September 17, 2012. Oral argument will be set at the convenience of the Court. By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: July 19, 2012 tmk/cc: Frank P. Cihlar, Esq. Gregory V. Davis, Esq. S. Robert Lyons, Esq. Alexander P. Robbins, Esq. Stephen R. LaCheen, Esq. Ian M. Comisky, Esq. Matthew D. Lee, Esq.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
