USA v. Mehef Bey, No. 22-11023 (11th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

USCA11 Case: 22-11023 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 02/28/2023 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11023 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MEHEF BEY, a.k.a. Arthur L. Daniels, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00063-PGB-GJK-2 USCA11 Case: 22-11023 2 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 02/28/2023 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 22-11023 ____________________ Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: H. Manuel Hernández, appointed counsel for Mehef Bey in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bey’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.