USA v. Cedric Deshaun Banks, No. 19-14995 (11th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 19-14995 Date Filed: 04/28/2021 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-14995 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00285-CG-N-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRIC DESHAUN BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (April 28, 2021) Before JILL PRYOR, LAGOA and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 19-14995 Date Filed: 04/28/2021 Page: 2 of 2 William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for Cedric Deshaun Banks in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Banks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Further, the government’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on a valid appeal waiver and Banks’s motion to discharge counsel and proceed pro se are DENIED as moot. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
